<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
	<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/</link>
	<description>"And we sail and we sail and we never see land, just the rum in the bottle and a pipe in my hand..."</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
		<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-661</link>
		<author>Royal Navy Trains Napkin Folders (Wall Street Journal) &#171; Sea-Fever blog</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-661</guid>
					<description>[...] the Never Sea Land blog for an embedded WSJ video supporting these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Never Sea Land blog for an embedded WSJ video supporting these [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
		<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-669</link>
		<author>Williwaw</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-669</guid>
					<description>Being a professional mariner, I don't believe it is such a bad idea that the Royal Navy offers training to their civilian counterparts.  To work on any "crew for hire" ship (in the U.S.) takes years of sea time and countless credentials for any sailor or officer to work in their capacity regardless of their skill and knowledge. I would be happy to train with the U.S. Coast Guard (again) in any facet as I am sure it would reduce the cost and increase the viability to the individual mariner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a professional mariner, I don&#8217;t believe it is such a bad idea that the Royal Navy offers training to their civilian counterparts.  To work on any &#8220;crew for hire&#8221; ship (in the U.S.) takes years of sea time and countless credentials for any sailor or officer to work in their capacity regardless of their skill and knowledge. I would be happy to train with the U.S. Coast Guard (again) in any facet as I am sure it would reduce the cost and increase the viability to the individual mariner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
		<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-671</link>
		<author>Maritime Monday 100 by Fred Fry &#124; gCaptain.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-671</guid>
					<description>[...] Sea Land thinks that the &#8220;Royal Navy sinks even lower&#8221; as it opens up to train private yacht crews. (With [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sea Land thinks that the &#8220;Royal Navy sinks even lower&#8221; as it opens up to train private yacht crews. (With [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
		<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-672</link>
		<author>Moby Dick</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-672</guid>
					<description>The "Navy sinks even lower" blog would be worrying if it were true, but it is not.  If you read the original article, printed in the London Times on Sat 2nd March, you will see that one of the contractors that provides training for the Royal Navy, Flagship Ltd, is allowed through its contract with the RN to sell any spare capacity in its training facilities, after it has fulfilled its agreement with the Navy.  Many of Flagship's trainers are ex RN, and the end result will be that other mariners, superyacht crews possibly included, will be taught to the same high standards as demanded by the RN. No one sets higher standards around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Navy sinks even lower&#8221; blog would be worrying if it were true, but it is not.  If you read the original article, printed in the London Times on Sat 2nd March, you will see that one of the contractors that provides training for the Royal Navy, Flagship Ltd, is allowed through its contract with the RN to sell any spare capacity in its training facilities, after it has fulfilled its agreement with the Navy.  Many of Flagship&#8217;s trainers are ex RN, and the end result will be that other mariners, superyacht crews possibly included, will be taught to the same high standards as demanded by the RN. No one sets higher standards around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Royal Navy sinks even lower | Never Sea Land</title>
		<link>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-673</link>
		<author>Maritime Monday 100 &#124; gCaptain.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://neversealand.downtothesea.org/2008/02/28/royal-navy-sinks-even-lower/#comment-673</guid>
					<description>[...] Sea Land thinks that the &#8220;Royal Navy sinks even lower&#8221; as it opens up to train private yacht crews. (With [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sea Land thinks that the &#8220;Royal Navy sinks even lower&#8221; as it opens up to train private yacht crews. (With [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
